Does My Fixed Index Annuity Charge Margin/Spread/Administrative Fees?

In some annuities, the index-linked interest rate is computed by subtracting a specific percentage from any calculated change in the index. This percentage, sometimes referred to as the "margin", "spread", or "administrative fee," might be instead of, or in addition to, a participation rate. For example, if the calculated change in the index is 10%, your annuity might specify that 2.25% will be subtracted from the rate to determine the interest rate credited. In this example, the rate would be 7.75% (10% -2.25% = 7.75%). In this example, the company subtracts the percentage only if the change in the index produces a positive interest rate.

Annuity

Protections for AIG Policyholders

Protections for AIG Policyholders - WSJ.com

People with an annuity or a life-insurance, auto or homeowners policy through American International Group are no doubt mighty worried right now as they watch that company struggling.

But policyholders don't need to panic, experts say. For one thing, while the holding company is in financial distress, AIG's insurance subsidiaries are separate entities that are financially sound, regulators and others say.

AIG's insurance subsidiaries "did not receive a bailout; they are financially solvent," Sandy Praeger, president of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, said in a statement last week. She added in an interview that "state insurance laws regulate the AIG subsidiaries to assure that the assets are preserved to protect the interests of policyholders."

Further, if an insurance company were to fail, each state runs an insurance guaranty association to protect policyholders. Insurers ante up fees to ensure customers of failed firms are protected. Still, those state guarantees are limited -- and that potentially could mean problems for some policyholders if an insurer becomes insolvent.

Your best bet now is to take a measured approach. Find out whether you're fully protected by state guarantees. Contact your state insurance department, or look up your state's rules at www.nolhga.com.

If you're not, weigh your options. Talk to your insurance broker about possible surrender charges or other penalties for exiting your policy or annuity, and determine the cost of purchasing similar products elsewhere. Remember that even consumers with policies worth more than their state's guaranteed limit may have nothing to worry about given that these insurers are solvent.
Life-Insurance Protections

State guaranty associations protect life-insurance policyholders for at least $100,000 in cash surrender or withdrawal value and at least $300,000 ($250,000 in California) in death benefits, says Peter Gallanis, president of the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations in Herndon, Va. Some states provide protection up to $500,000.

For policyholders within their state's limits, if a company fails, "there is a very good chance that your policy will be transferred [to a different insurer] and you'll never miss a beat," Mr. Gallanis says.

For fixed annuities, states generally cover up to $100,000, though some guarantee $300,000 or more.

Variable annuities are investment products. Generally your money is invested through a subaccount that is separate from the insurer's assets and not covered by state associations. However, the portion of the contract that promises a payout from the insurer usually is covered.

Usually a failed insurer's business is taken over by another company in what can be a seamless transition for policyholders, Mr. Gallanis says.

"Typically the new insurer will provide all of the protection that would have been provided under the old policy," he says.

But it is possible in some situations that people with life-insurance policies worth more than the state limits may find they're on the hook for a higher premium or a reduced death benefit, Mr. Gallanis says.

Similarly, it's possible an annuity contract might be modified by an acquiring company; for instance, if the promised interest rate is deemed too high. But that's a rare event, requires approval by regulators, and is much likelier when an insurance company's failure is rooted in its policy-writing practices.
Auto, Home Policies

There are similar state guaranty associations protecting consumers with homeowners and auto-insurance policies. If you have a claim filed with a company that then fails, "the guaranty fund steps into the shoes of the insurance company from a claims-paying perspective," says Roger Schmelzer, chief executive of the National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds in Indianapolis. Most state guaranty associations cover homeowners- and auto-policy claims up to $300,000, he says.

If you've prepaid a premium, that is also usually recoverable through the guaranty association, says Barb Cox, the group's vice president of legal and regulatory affairs, though the limit may be $10,000 or $25,000.

Meanwhile, if you're simply holding a policy, with no claims in process, then consider shopping around, Mr. Schmelzer says.

Read more at marketwatch.com

Write to Andrea Coombes at andrea.coombes@dowjones.com

Fixed Annuity

5 Failures of SEC Chairman Cox

5 Failures of SEC Chairman Cox - Seeking Alpha

5 Failures of SEC Chairman Cox
by: Mark Sunshine

Almost all paths of incompetence in the current crisis run through the office of the Chairman of the SEC, Chris Cox. McCain’s solution to fire Cox isn’t tough enough. Exile is better. Fortunately for Cox this isn’t the Stalinist Soviet Union or his fate could be a lot worse.

Cox’s failures are too numerous to count. However, I’ll give it a try. Below are what I think are his top 5 failings.

1.

Failure to enforce disclosure laws and regulations.

Disclosure rules and regulations protect investors by requiring companies to disclose everything that is needed for informed investment decisions. And, CEOs and CFOs are required to sign certifications that such disclosure is materially accurate, complete, and that their companies have adequate internal controls to ensure such accuracy and completeness.

Enforcement of disclosure rules and regulations has been a joke. CEOs lie to shareholders with impunity and without fear of SEC enforcement. It is impossible to conclude that SEC filings for Freddie, Fannie, AIG, Lehman, or Bear Stearns complied with SEC rules and regulations.

However, instead of enforcement by the SEC, there is silence. While not all management actions are criminal, why hasn’t the SEC used its civil enforcement authority, i.e., assessing fines and penalties? How about protecting future investors by banning failed executives and boards of directors from serving in executive management at other public companies?
2.

Failure to enforce accounting standards.

When Cox states that the SEC doesn’t have regulatory authority over capital adequacy of financial services companies, he isn’t telling the truth. The SEC has regulatory authority over the financial statements of ALL publicly traded companies in the U.S. which of course includes the financials. If Cox had required greater reserves and transparency of financial services companies it would have happened.

Every quarter all publically traded companies file reports with the SEC that are provided to shareholders and the SEC has review and comment authority. If the SEC deems financial disclosure inadequate, incomplete or opaque it has the authority to force the company to amend its filings. It also has authority to establish accounting standards for publically traded companies which means it can have different requirements than GAAP.

So when the AIG filed its last quarterly report and decided that it didn’t need to have loan loss reserves against defaulting mortgages and securities, the SEC had the ability to require additional loan loss reserves. When Freddie and Fannie decided to pretend that defaulted mortgage were good assets because it changed its accounting standards, the SEC could have just said “no”. When Lehman manufactured $2.4 billion of pre-tax income by pretending that it wasn’t going to repay its debts (one of the dumber aspects of mark to market accounting), the SEC should have protected investors with disclosure.
3.

Failure to supervise the rating agencies.

Cox wants everyone to believe that despite being the rating agency’s only regulator, the SEC has no oversight or enforcement authority and cannot influence their performance. Once again, the SEC’s statements are false. Cox assumes that no one will take the time to read the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006 which states that the SEC has the right to suspend or revoke the license of any of rating agency for a wide range of reasons. Rating agency regulation and reform is Cox’s responsibility.
4.

Failure to investigate and prevent market manipulation, i.e., naked short selling.

Free markets are supposed to be honest markets. The naked short selling issue isn’t new and the SEC’s knee jerk emergency response is an embarrassment. The ban on short selling of 799 stocks is very similar to Putin’s actions this week to manipulate the Russian stock market. I haven’t a clue whether or not the uptick rule works, but I know that enforcing rules on naked short selling shouldn’t have required destructive and ill thought out emergency orders. In the middle of the 1800’s the legendary financial scoundrel, Daniel Drew, understood naked short selling was bad (as he lost his fortune covering a short squeeze) when he said, “He who sells what isn’t his’n, Must buy it back or go to prison.” Too bad Cox never took economic history in school (or googled economic trivia).
5.

Failure to protect small investors.

It is no coincidence that according to the FT, stock ownership by individual investors is at an all-time low. The average individual investor knows that his chances in the market aren’t good. And the SEC doesn’t seem to care if the average guy is disenfranchised from the economic future of America. In addition to the above failures, Cox forgot that it was his job to make sure that brokers shouldn’t engage in deceptive sales practices (like in the sale of auction rate securities and the sale of Freddie and Fannie common and preferred stock to small investors because they were “guaranteed” by the government). Cox refuses to support private litigation by individual investors who were ripped off in the stock and bond market. If the SEC doesn’t protect the little guy, who will?

It is hard to think of how anyone could have done a worse job than Chris Cox (other than engaging in illegal conduct). But if anyone can think of things that I have missed, please feel free to tell everyone reading this by commenting. I doubt that my list is complete.

Fixed Annuities

Does my index annuity compound?

Interest Compounding

Some annuities pay simple interest during an index term. That means index-linked interest is added to your original premium amount but does not compound during the term. Others pay compound interest during a term, which means that index-linked interest that has already been credited also earns interest in the future. In either case, however, the interest earned in one term is usually compounded in the next.
Annuity Rates

AIG collapse would have cost N.C. $1B - Charlotte Business Journal

AIG collapse would have cost N.C. $1B - Charlotte Business Journal:

If the federal government had allowed insurance colossus American International Group Inc. and its subsidiaries to fail, N.C. regulators — and ultimately state taxpayers — would have been left with a mess that would have cost, according to a conservative estimate, more than $1 billion to clean up.

That’s the back-of-the-envelope number that officials at the Raleigh-based N.C. Insurance Guaranty Association came up with as they monitored this week’s developments on Wall Street, including the $85 billion federal loan guarantee that’s supposed to save AIG.

“We wanted to see what our exposure would be,” says Mike Newton, the association’s guaranty director. “And the more we looked at it, the wider our eyes got.”

The federal government now controls almost 80 percent of AIG.

Insurance companies, large and small, don’t file for bankruptcy in the way most businesses do. When they topple, they go into a liquidation process in which regulators try to make sure policyholders are protected ahead of other creditors.

On the state level, industry groups such as NCIGA enter the picture to ensure all outstanding policy claims are paid — on auto crashes, for example — and to refund customers any premium dollars paid for coverage that won’t be coming.

The industry groups get the funds to do that by passing the hat among the other insurance companies doing business in the state. In North Carolina, contributions come from 700 firms that, in 2007, had $6.5 billion in premiums in force. Any cleanup money those firms pay can then be deducted from their N.C. tax bills, which means the taxpayer ultimately picks up the tab.

As news of AIG’s chances of survival went from bad to worse, Newton searched the records of the 13 AIG property and casualty companies writing business in North Carolina. Those firms include American Home Assurance, National Union Fire and Granite State Insurance.

Outstanding claims and refundable premiums — the tab NCIGA would be held liable for refunding in case of a collapse — totaled $785 million. Of that total, $359 million was in the workers’ compensation arena, $43.6 million in auto insurance and $383.4 million in “all other categories, including fire, marine and similar types of policies.”

“These numbers we were looking at were just huge,” says Newton.

And that was just in North Carolina.

“Obviously, these numbers are the reason why the feds had to move,” says state Rep. John Blust of Greensboro, a member of the House Insurance Committee.

An AIG failure would have dwarfed the cost of any previous insurance collapse in the state. The most costly to date came after the demise of workers’ comp writer Reliance Insurance. That tab was $80 million.

In an AIG meltdown, the cost of a North Carolina cleanup would have gone even higher than Newton’s initial estimate, to perhaps $1 billion or more.

That’s because seven AIG subsidiaries also write life and health policies and various annuity plans in North Carolina. On the annuity front alone, AIG’s Sun America, at the beginning of 2007, was the state’s third-largest annuity writer at $331 million, giving it a market share of nearly 6 percent. Another subsidiary, AIG Annuity Insurance, had $46 million on its books, for a market share of nearly 1 percent.

The total North Carolina market is about $6 billion. The figures were complied by the state Department of Insurance.

If AIG’s subsidiaries firms had been caught up in the failure of their holding company, a second state group, the North Carolina Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association, would have activated a procedure to pay consumer refunds of up to $300,000 per policyholder for claims and premium refunds.

That agency’s head, Lowell Miller, declines to put a figure on the possible cleanup costs. “But it would have been pretty significant,” he says. “The life and health numbers are big, and they generally are long-term contracts.”

Kristin Milam, a spokeswoman for the N.C. Department of Insurance, says the department routinely monitors the economic health of all the firms doing business in the state, including those under the AIG umbrella.

She notes it was the AIG holding company, not the insurance subsidiaries, that was in crisis. And Newton says all the AIG firms doing business in the state are well-capitalized and “doing fine.”

But because of the turmoil on Wall Street, he says it’s impossible to say for certain if the damage would have been limited to the holding company if AIG had gone under.

Annuity

Regulatory Safeguards Offer ‘Insurance Policy’ in Times of Crisis

Insurance Consumers Protected by Solvency Standards (NAIC)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INSURANCE CONSUMERS PROTECTED BY SOLVENCY STANDARDS
Regulatory Safeguards Offer ‘Insurance Policy’ in Times of Crisis

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Sept. 16, 2008) — National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) President and Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger today issued the following statement in response to the financial issues facing American International Group (AIG):

“We have a very strong message for consumers: If you have a policy with an AIG insurance company, they are solvent and have the capability to pay claims. Our job is to ensure that they continue to have the ability to pay.

“In this particular instance, AIG’s insurance subsidiaries are being asked to provide liquid assets to the financially distressed non-insurance parent company in exchange for non-liquid assets. The New York State and Pennsylvania Insurance Departments are working with AIG to review the transaction. State insurance regulators will only approve this type of action if they are assured it is part of a total resolution of the liquidity issue at the parent company and fairly compensates its insurance company subsidiaries.

“As a holding company, AIG is a separate, federally regulated legal entity that is distinct and apart from its subsidiary insurers. The subsidiary insurers are governed by state laws designed to protect the interest of policyholders. State insurance regulators are committed to protecting the interest of policyholders and will work closely with AIG management and other regulators to fulfill this commitment.

“The No. 1 job of state insurance regulators is to make sure insurance companies operate on a financially sound basis. If needed, we immediately step in if it appears that an insurer will be unable to fulfill the promises made to its policyholders. This includes taking over the management of an insurer through a conservation or rehabilitation order, the goal being to get the insurer back into a strong solvency position.

“State regulators have numerous actions they can take to prevent an insurer from failing. Claims from individual policyholders are given the utmost priority over other creditors in these matters — and, in the unlikely event that assets are not enough to cover these claims, there is still another safety net in place to protect consumers: the state guaranty funds. These funds are in place in all states. If an insurance company becomes unable to pay claims, the guaranty fund will provide coverage, subject to certain limits.

“It is a state insurance regulator’s responsibility to protect policyholders and ensure a healthy, competitive market for insurance products. Strict solvency standards and keen financial oversight — based on conservative investment and accounting rules — continue to be the bedrock of state-based insurance regulation.”

About the NAIC

Headquartered in Kansas City, Mo., the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is a voluntary organization of the chief insurance regulatory officials of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories. The NAIC’s overriding objective is to assist state insurance regulators in protecting consumers and helping maintain the financial stability of the insurance industry by offering financial, actuarial, legal, computer, research, market conduct and economic expertise. Formed in 1871, the NAIC is the oldest association of state officials. For more than 135 years, state-based insurance supervision has served the needs of consumers, industry and the business of insurance at-large by ensuring hands-on, frontline protection for consumers, while providing insurers the uniform platforms and coordinated systems they need to compete effectively in an ever-changing marketplace. For more information, visit www.naic.org/press_home.htm.

Annuity

INSURANCE CONSUMERS PROTECTED BY SOLVENCY STANDARDS

Insurance Consumers Protected by Solvency Standards (NAIC)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INSURANCE CONSUMERS PROTECTED BY SOLVENCY STANDARDS
Regulatory Safeguards Offer ‘Insurance Policy’ in Times of Crisis

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (Sept. 16, 2008) — National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) President and Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger today issued the following statement in response to the financial issues facing American International Group (AIG):

“We have a very strong message for consumers: If you have a policy with an AIG insurance company, they are solvent and have the capability to pay claims. Our job is to ensure that they continue to have the ability to pay.

“In this particular instance, AIG’s insurance subsidiaries are being asked to provide liquid assets to the financially distressed non-insurance parent company in exchange for non-liquid assets. The New York State and Pennsylvania Insurance Departments are working with AIG to review the transaction. State insurance regulators will only approve this type of action if they are assured it is part of a total resolution of the liquidity issue at the parent company and fairly compensates its insurance company subsidiaries.

“As a holding company, AIG is a separate, federally regulated legal entity that is distinct and apart from its subsidiary insurers. The subsidiary insurers are governed by state laws designed to protect the interest of policyholders. State insurance regulators are committed to protecting the interest of policyholders and will work closely with AIG management and other regulators to fulfill this commitment.

“The No. 1 job of state insurance regulators is to make sure insurance companies operate on a financially sound basis. If needed, we immediately step in if it appears that an insurer will be unable to fulfill the promises made to its policyholders. This includes taking over the management of an insurer through a conservation or rehabilitation order, the goal being to get the insurer back into a strong solvency position.

“State regulators have numerous actions they can take to prevent an insurer from failing. Claims from individual policyholders are given the utmost priority over other creditors in these matters — and, in the unlikely event that assets are not enough to cover these claims, there is still another safety net in place to protect consumers: the state guaranty funds. These funds are in place in all states. If an insurance company becomes unable to pay claims, the guaranty fund will provide coverage, subject to certain limits.

“It is a state insurance regulator’s responsibility to protect policyholders and ensure a healthy, competitive market for insurance products. Strict solvency standards and keen financial oversight — based on conservative investment and accounting rules — continue to be the bedrock of state-based insurance regulation.”

About the NAIC

Headquartered in Kansas City, Mo., the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is a voluntary organization of the chief insurance regulatory officials of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories. The NAIC’s overriding objective is to assist state insurance regulators in protecting consumers and helping maintain the financial stability of the insurance industry by offering financial, actuarial, legal, computer, research, market conduct and economic expertise. Formed in 1871, the NAIC is the oldest association of state officials. For more than 135 years, state-based insurance supervision has served the needs of consumers, industry and the business of insurance at-large by ensuring hands-on, frontline protection for consumers, while providing insurers the uniform platforms and coordinated systems they need to compete effectively in an ever-changing marketplace. For more information, visit www.naic.org/press_home.htm.

Annuity

HOW DO I KNOW WHICH EQUITY-INDEXED ANNUITY IS BEST FOR ME?

As with any other insurance product, you must carefully consider your own personal situation and how you feed about the choices available. No single annuity design may have all the features you want. It is important to understand the features and trade-offs available so you can chose the annuity that is right for you. Keep in mind that it may be misleading to compare one annuity to another unless you compare all the other features of each annuity. You must decide for yourself what combination of features makes the most sense for you. Also remember that it is not possible to predict the future behavior of an index.

Annuities

Annuity

Indexed Annuities Average Monthly and Daily

In some annuities, the average of an index's value is used rather than the actual value of the index on a specified date. The index averaging may occur at the beginning, the end, or throughout the entire term of the annuity.

Floor on Equity-Indexed Linked Interest

The floor is the minimum index-linked interest rate you will earn. The most common floor is 0%. A 0% floor assures that even if the index decreases in value, the index-linked interest that you earn will be zero and not negative. As in the case of a cap, not all annuities have a stated floor on index-linked interest rates. But in all cases, your fixed annuity will have a minimum guaranteed value.

What is an index annuity participation rate?

The participation rate decides how much of the increase in the index will be used to calculate index-linked interest. For example, if the calculated change in the index is 9% and the participation rate is 70%, the index-linked interest rate for your annuity will be 6.3% (9% x 70% = 6.3%). A company may set a different participation rate for newly issued annuities as often as each day. Therefore, the initial participation rate in your annuity will depend on when it is issued by the company. The company usually guarantees the participation rate for a specific period (from one year to the entire term). When that period is over, the company sets a new participation rate for the next period. Some annuities guarantee that the participation rate will never be set lower than a specified minimum or higher than a specified maximum.
Index Annuity Rate

Which index-linked interest is calculated?

The index term is the period over which index-linked interest is calculated; the interest is credited to your annuity at the end of a term. Terms are generally from one to ten years, with six or seven years being most common. Some annuities offer single terms while others offer multiple, consecutive terms. If your annuity has multiple terms, there will usually be a window at the end of each term, typically 30 days, during which you may withdraw your money without penalty. For installment premium annuities, the payment of each premium may begin a new term for that premium.

Annuity Rates

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE EQUITY-INDEXED CONTRACT FEATURES?

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE EQUITY-INDEXED CONTRACT FEATURES?

Two features that have the greatest effect on the amount of additional interest that may be credited to an equity-indexed annuity are the indexing method and the participation rate. It is important to understand the features and how they work together. The following describes some other equity-indexed annuity features that affect the index-linked formula.

Indexing Method

The indexing method means the approach used to measure the amount of change, if any, in the index. Some of the most common indexing methods, which are explained more fully later on, include annual reset (ratcheting), high-water mark and point-to-point.

Annuity Rates